2005 (11) TMI 137

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ional retrospectively on the basis of erroneous filing of price list by the appellants subsequent to the amalgamation of Ind-tech Speciality Chemicals Limited with the appellants by order passed by the High Court on 12th February, 1993 for the period 1-1-92 to 30-5-94. The second issue is method of valuation of goods captively consumed for the period 1-1-92 to 31-12-95. The question is whether value should be decided by the application of notional profit of 10% or by adding the profit percentage of the final products as reflected in the previous year. 3. Shri Rajesh C. Kumar, ld. Advocate appeared for the appellants and Shri S. Reddy, ld. SDR for the Revenue. 4. Ld. Counsel submitted that the appellants are engaged in the manufacture ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nal No. 6/2001, dated 15-5-2001 was passed for the period 1-1-92 to 30-5-94 demanding duty of Rs. 1,12,54,989/-. The Commissioner (Appeals) passed the impugned order in respect of the orders in Original dated 30-10-2000 and 15-5-2001. He confirmed both the orders. According to ld. Counsel, the Order-in-Original dated 15-9-2001 re-opened a issue which has already been decided during the period from 1-1-92 to 30-5-94. The assessment in respect of M/s. Ind-tech Specialty Chemicals Ltd. had already been finalised. Because of the merger of the appellants with the subsidiary company, price lists were filed for retrospective period under a mistaken notion of law. This should not be used against the appellants as the assessment have already been fi....