Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
Bars
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2005 (11) TMI 133

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Products, who in turn, supplied the same to different regional stores of APSRTC against their purchase orders wherein one of the conditions was that the goods must be with the 'IPR' brand. The department, on investigation, found the supplies with the IPR Trade mark and had held that the appellants had used the brand name of another person. The appellants contended that the Revenue had not discharged their burden of showing that the appellants had used the brand name and 'IPR' mark was a brand name or trade name. It was submitted that the department had incorrectly assumed that the mark 'IPR' was a brand name or a trade name when it was not so. It was contended that the statements of Shri K.K. Balachandar, GPA holder of the appellant unit a....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....oimbatore, 2001 (137) E.L.T. 1180 (Tri.-Chennai) (ii) CCE, Chennai v. Turnbull Control System (I) Ltd., 2001 (127) E.L.T. 472 (Tri. - Chennai) 4.The learned Counsel also submitted that the demands were barred by time as the Show Cause Notice had been issued after two years of recording the statements. 5.The learned SDR reiterated the Apex Court judgment rendered in the case of CCE, Trichy v. Grasim Industries Ltd., 2005 (183) E.L.T. 123 (S.C.). E/245/2005 6.This appeal arises from OIA No. 17/2004-CE dated 16-12-2004 by which the Commissioner (Appeals) had allowed the department's appeal and set aside the original order which was in favour of the assessee. The department had confiscated 62 bundles of Precured Tread Rubber (with 'IRL' ma....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nts of Shri K.K. Balachandar and Shri C.T. Joseph that both had not admitted the use of brand name or trade name. They had denied having supplied various branded goods to anyone including M/s. India Rubber Products for IRP brands. Shri K.K. Balachandar, GPA holder of the appellant unit denied having manufactured the IRP branded goods and supplied the same to M/s. India Rubber Products. The statement of Shri C.T. Joseph, the Authorized Signatory of M/s. India Rubber Products also disclosed that they were supplying Precured Tread Rubber product to APSRTC. They put identification mark IRP on the Carton box/HDPE woven sacks in respect of Precured Tread Rubber, Tyre Flaps and Bonding Gum and in respect of Black Vulcanising Solution/Cement, they ....