Loading...

⚠ ✕
❮ Top
☎ Help
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback✕

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ To Call / Whatsapp, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2026 (10) TMI 1912

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nd in law, the order of the Ld. Addl.CIT(A), Bhubneswar is justified in view of the CBDT Circular No. 13/2025 dated 19.09.2025, which has made is expressly clear that it was never the statutory intent to allow rebate in cases WHARE income is chargeable to tax U/s 115BAC(1) of the Act and any such cases WHARE rebate is erroneously claimed are to be rectified, thereby having no doubt that such claim was statutorily never permissible 3. The appellant craves leave OR reserves right to amend, modify, alter, add OR forego any ground(s) of appeal at any time before OR during the hearing of this appeal. 3. The solitary issue in the present appeal relates to denial of rebate of tax claimed by the assessee u/s 87A of the Act, on the taxes paid on income earned on short term capital gain. The denial of rebate was made by the CPC while processing the return of income filed by the assessee, in the intimation made u/s 143(1) of the Act. The assessee had filed return of income on 20.06.2024 declaring total income at Rs. 4,32,280/-. The total income consists of short term capital gain to the tune of Rs. 2,12,152/- and claimed tax rebate of Rs. 19,857/- u/s 87A of the Act, which was den....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....antibhai Palsana vs. ITO, Ward-1(9) Ahmedabad for AY 2024-25 (ITA No. 1014/Ahd/2025). In that order, the Hon'ble ITAT, on identical facts and issues, ruled unequivocally in favour of the Appellant. Here it is stated that this decision is applicable to the present case of the appellant and the above mentioned ITAT order is reproduced as below:- "5. We have carefully considered the rival submissions, the impugned order of the CIT(A), the material placed on record, and the applicable statutory provisions. Thus, the core issue for adjudication before us is - "Whether a resident individual who has exercised the option under section 115BAC(1A) and whose total income is below Rs. 7,00,000/-, is eligible to claim rebate under section 87A against tax payable on STCG under section 111A, in the absence of any express restriction in section 87A or section 111A." 5.4. The undisputed facts of the case are that the assessee, a resident individual, filed a revised return of income for A.Y. 2024-25 declaring total income of Rs. 4,65,440/-, comprising short-term capital gain on listed equity shares taxable at 15% under section 111A, and opted for taxation under the new....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ion of income-under the concessional rate regime, subject to existing special rate provisions under Chapter XII, such as sections 111A, 112, 112A, etc. This clause governs the computation of tax and does not ipso facto affect eligibility to rebates or deductions unless specifically restricted. Section 87A is not part of Chapter XII; it is an independent rebate provision under Chapter VIII of the Act. Therefore, the overriding clause in section 115BAC(1A) does not derogate modify section 87A, unless section 87A itself provides for exclusion, which, in the present case, it does not. Thus, section 87A operates on the total tax computed, whether it includes tax at slab rates or special rates, and applies so long as the total income threshold is met 5.12. The CITA) placed strong r reliance the Explanatory Memorandum to the Finance Bill 2025, which clarified that rebate under section 87A is not available tax arising from special rata incomes, including those under section 111A. However, we find this reliance to be misplaced for two. reasons: Firstly, the Finance Bill 2025 itself proposes to insert new restrictions on rebate under section 87A w.e.f. A.Y. 2026-27, which i....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....5BAC(1A) of the Act. On a plain reading of the statutory provisions, there exists no express bar either in section 87A or section 111A for denial of rebate in respect of tax payable on short-term capital gains arising from transfer of listed equity shares taxable at special rates under section 111A. The legislative intent is further clarified by the subsequent amendment proposed in the Finance Bill, 2025, which is prospective in nature and thereby reinforces that restriction was in force during the relevant assessment year. The denial of rebate under section 87A by the CPC, Bengaluru, appears to be based solely such on system-driven logic and not on any statutory mandate. Moreover, the interpretation adopted by the CIT(A) in upholding such denial is, in our considered view, not in consonance with the plain and unambiguous language of the law as applicable for A.Y. 2024-55.16. Accordingly, we hold that the assessee is eligible for rebate under section 87A for A.Y. 2024-25 even though the income includes STCG taxable under section 111A. The AO is directed to allow rebate of Rs. 13,320/- and recompute tax liability accordingly. The demand of Rs. 15,820/- raised in CPC intimation stand....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....lam Venkatraman v. ITO [ITA No.1431/Chny/2025, order dated 20.08.2025]. The Tribunal therein held that the provisions of section 87A of the Act provide rebate on the entire tax liability computed on the "total income" without drawing any distinction between income taxable at normal rates and income taxable at special rates. It was accordingly concluded that rebate u/s. 87A of the Act is available even in respect of such incomes taxed under special provisions. The relevant findings are extracted below for ease of reference:- "5.0 been concluded that to claim the rebate total income is to be computed after excluding any special rate income so as to determine the final tax liability. We have noted that the view taken by the Ld.CIT(A) of assessee filing return u/s 115BAC and consequently ineligible for rebate is not in order. The only controversy in this case is whether rebate u/s 87A is available on all the incomes or there is any exclusion. We have noted that the provisions of section 87A do not provide for such an exclusion. The first proviso to section 87A includes an exemption qua total income falling u/s 115BAC (1A) however the impugned amendment has been brought by Fina....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....it has done so expressly. In contrast, the absence of any exclusion in section 111A or in section 87A must be construed in favour of the assessee. 5.12 At this point we discuss the interplay of Section 115BAC(1A) with Chapter XII where the scope is Confined to Computation of Tax Rates. Section 115BAC(1A) opens with the phrase: "Notwithstanding anything contained in this Act but subject to the provisions of this Chapter..." 5.13 The purpose of this clause is to enable the computation of income tax under the concessional rate regime, subject to existing special rate provisions under Chapter XII, such as sections 111A, 112, 112A, etc. This clause governs the computation of tax and does not ipso facto affect eligibility to rebates or deductions unless specifically restricted. Section 87A is not part of Chapter XII; it is an independent rebate provision under Chapter VIII of the Act. Therefore, the overriding clause in section 115BAC(1A) does not derogate or modify section 87A, unless section 87A itself provides for exclusion, which, in the present case, it does not. Thus, section 87A operates on the total tax computed, whether it includes tax at slab rates or....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ria for the A.Y. 2024-25. While not binding, the said appellate order affirms that divergent views exist and such benefit has been allowed in similar factual circumstances. 5.17 In view of the above discussion, we find that the assessee is a resident individual and the total income declared for the assessment year 2024-25 does not exceed Rs. 7,00,000. It is also an admitted position that the assessee has exercised the option to be assessed under the new tax regime in accordance with the provisions of section 115BAC(1A) of the Act. On a plain reading of the statutory provisions, there exists no express bar either in section 87A or section 111A for denial of rebate in respect of tax payable on short-term capital gains arising from transfer of listed equity shares taxable at special rates under section 111A. The legislative intent is further clarified by the subsequent amendment proposed in the Finance Bill, 2025, which is prospective in nature and thereby reinforces that no such restriction was in force during the relevant assessment year. The denial of rebate under section 87A by the CPC, Bengaluru, appears to be based solely on system-driven logic and not on any statutory ....