Loading...

⚠ ✕
❮ Top
☎ Help
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback✕

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ To Call / Whatsapp, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

Revision for unexamined depreciation fails where assessment records show inquiry and no revenue prejudice from amortisation timing.

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Revision for alleged lack of inquiry into depreciation on toll-collection and sea-link operation rights was unsupported where the assessment record contained notices, details of the intangible-asset investment, the concession agreement and the depreciation claim. CBDT Circular No. 9/2014 concerning expenditure incurred by a BOT road or highway developer did not apply to a non-developer concessionaire that acquired toll-collection, operation and maintenance rights. As the cost was deductible through either depreciation or amortisation, the difference concerned timing and caused no real prejudice to revenue. The revision was quashed and the original assessment restored.....