Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2005 (6) TMI 183

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ve been filed by the appellants against the common Order-in-Appeal vide which the Commissioner (Appeals) has confirmed the duty and penalty against the firm i.e. appellant No. 1, besides confiscation of the goods and also imposed personal penalty on appellant No. 2, the partner. 2. I have heard both the sides and gone through the record. The duty of rupees 1,67,919/- has been confirmed in respe....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....found inputs by the appellants in the market. Therefore, the impugned order, confirming the duty on the short found inputs, cannot be sustained and is set aside. 3. Regarding confiscation of the excess found finished goods, i.e. copper wire/rods, in my view, the impugned order cannot be sustained. The raw material for the production of the finished goods was issued on 30-10-2000, as is evident ....