Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2005 (6) TMI 166

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... the refiners. For this purpose, he sends his employees to different silversmiths or persons dealing in silver ornaments. In course of his normal business the appellant sent his two employees Sri Radheshyam Prasad and Shri Shankar Shaw with 11 & 8 pieces of silver weighing 10.500 kgs. and 8.800 kgs. respectively to Banaras. Challans were also sent along with the silver. On the way to Banaras both the employees were intercepted by the Customs Officials. Sri Shankar Shaw was released and the total silver was shown to have seized from Sri Radheshyam Prasad. The silver weighing 19.488 kgs. valued at Rs. 1,26,672.00 was seized by the Inspector of Customs (Prev.). The statement was recorded from Sri Radheshyam Prasad wherein he stated that the si....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ngle piece is up to 30 kgs. and the total weight does not exceed 100 kgs., they are not to be considered to be covered under the provisions of Section-123 of the Customs Act, 1962. In that case onus is on the department to prove that the goods have been smuggled in India. The Department fails to discharge the burden. Therefore, he submits that the silver is not liable to be confiscated. He relies on the following decisions : (i)         2005 (179) E.L.T. 110 (Tribunal) (ii)        2002 (142) E.L.T. 342 (Tribunal-L.B) (iii)       2002 (140) E.L.T. 233 (T) = 2001 (47) RLT 90 (CEGAT) (iv)       2001....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ns possessing small quantities of silver of Indian origin, it has been decided that normally the provisions of Section 123 of the Customs Act, 1962 should not be invoked against persons who are found to be in possession of silver bullion of less than 100 kgs. However, if the silver bullion is found to be in the form of bars weighing 30 kgs. (appropriately) each which are being smuggled into the country and also where silver bullion is found to bear foreign markings, the question of seizure may be considered even when the quantity is less than 100 kgs. by an officer not lower in rank than that of an Assistant Collector of Customs". The Larger Bench in the case of Shambhu Nath v. Commr. of Customs, Lucknow Reported in 2002 (142) E.L.T. 342....