Loading...

⚠ ✕
❮ Top
☎ Help
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback✕

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

Resolution-plan feasibility fails where SEZ land conversion lacks consent and the Information Memorandum conceals regulatory uncertainty.

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Material defects in the Information Memorandum, including overstated debt, omission of guarantor recovery, erroneous creditor ranking and undisclosed SEZ de-notification, distort voting, valuation and resolution-plan feasibility; commercial wisdom cannot cure those defects. A corporate guarantor that pays the financial creditor is subrogated to secured rights only to the amount paid and must be ranked as a secured financial creditor. The financial creditor's claim against the principal borrower must be recomputed from the finally adjudicated debt after crediting recovery from the guarantor. A plan requiring conversion or sub-leasing of SEZ leasehold land without statutory consent or completed approvals is neither feasible nor viable. The process must restart with a corrected Information Memorandum and fresh resolution invitation.....