Loading...

⚠ ✕
❮ Top
☎ Help
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback✕

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

Extended-period reassessment and digital evidence require statutory nexus and independent corroboration before tax additions can stand.

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Extended-period reassessment requires recorded reasons to link escaped income to a prescribed asset, transaction-related expenditure, event or occasion, or book entry; unidentified unaccounted receipts or expenses alone do not satisfy that jurisdictional condition, invalidating the challenged reassessments. For the assessment year preceding the search year, a section 143(3) assessment cannot be completed without notice under sections 147/148. Digital material alleging unaccounted sales must demonstrate relevance, authenticity, integrity and probative value, with identifiable completed sales or receipts and independent corroboration. Uncontextualised WhatsApp chats, unrebutted retracted statements, unreconciled seized records, or backward projection of later-year material cannot establish year-specific taxable income or sustain profit estimation.....