Loading...

⚠ ✕
❮ Top
☎ Help
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback✕

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

PMLA attachments cannot rely on later FIRs absent from original proceedings, requiring fresh action after investigation.

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Provisional attachment, seizure, retention and freezing under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act cannot be sustained by relying on subsequent FIRs that were not part of the original proceedings. The original FIR alone formed the basis of the Provisional Attachment Orders, recorded Reasons to Believe, Original Complaints and Original Applications, and it no longer survived. Although subsequent FIRs were incorporated through an addendum to the ECIR and could disclose predicate offences, they could not validate the original attachment proceedings through later prosecution material. The confirmation orders were set aside; subsequent FIRs could support separate action after investigation.....