Loading...

⚠ ✕
❮ Top
☎ Help
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback✕

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2025 (4) TMI 2201

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....012-13, arises against the CIT(A)/NFAC, Delhi's DIN & Order No. ITBA/NFAC/S/250-2024-25/1070209490(1) dated 08.11.2024, in proceedings u/s 143(3)/147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short "the Act"). 2. Heard both the parties. Case file perused. 3. Learned counsel submits at the outset that he neither wishes to press assessee's legal ground on "DIN" issue nor validity of reopening, hence, th....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....sent cash component of the above sale consideration only in light of Smt. Malini Ramnath Rele vs. ITO (1994) 49 ITD 43(MUM) (TM). The fact also remains that the assessee has not satisfactorily explained the source of his impugned cash deposits by reconciling all the relevant figures. It is thus deemed appropriate in the larger interest to restrict the impugned addition to Rs. 1,50,000/- only with ....