2025 (8) TMI 1875
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....Mukul Rohatgi, Sr. Adv. (NP) Mr. S Nagamuthu, Sr. Adv. Mr. Vipin Nair, AOR Mr. Mayank Jain, Adv. Mr. Madhur Jain, Adv. Mr. Harshwardhan Parghaniha, Adv. Mr. Arpit Goel, Adv. Mr. Deepak Jain, Adv. For the Respondent : Mr. S.V. Raju, ASG Mr. Bhuvan Kapoor, Adv. Mr. Annam Venkatesh, Adv. Mr. Zoheb Hussain, Adv. Mr. A.K. Sharma, AOR ORDER 1. Heard learned senior counsel for the peti....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... that even though both the trials may proceed before the same Special Court, it must be tried separately as per the provisions of the 1973 Code. Insofar as clause (ii) of the Explanation, at the first glance, it does give an impression that the same is unconnected with the earlier part of the section. However, on closer scrutiny of this provision, it is noted that the same is only an enabling prov....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ile a fresh complaint against the person who has not been named as accused in the complaint already filed in respect of same offence of money laundering, including to request the court to proceed against such other person appearing to be guilty of offence under Section 319 of the 1973 Code, which otherwise would apply to such a trial." 3. To sum up the contention of the petitioner, this Court h....
TaxTMI