Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2019 (6) TMI 1762

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....R Per Bench : These are appeals by the assessee against order's of learned CIT-A wherein following penalty levied under 271(1)(c) of the Act has been confirmed as under:- assessment year amount of penalty 2009-10 78,467 2010-11 223,022 2011-12 83,210 2. Brief facts of the case leading to the levy of penalty are that the assessing officer in these cases made disallo....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ficer. The purchase vouchers were duly produced and the payments were through banking channel. The sales are not doubted and the gross profit shown by the assessee was over 12.5%. In these backgrounds in our considered opinion assessee cannot be visited with the rigours of penalty under section 271(1)(c). As a matter of fact, on many occasions on similar circumstances in quantum proceedings the di....