Loading...

⚠ ✕
❮ Top
☎ Help
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback✕

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

Capital/Revenue Expenditure & Capital/Revenue Receipt... Hon'ble Minister Shri Arjun Meghwal & ITAT Explain

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....apital/Revenue Expenditure & Capital/Revenue Receipt... Hon'ble Minister Shri Arjun Meghwal & ITAT Explain<br>By: - Vivek Jalan<br>Income Tax<br>Dated:- 29-9-2026<br>Hon&#39;ble Minister of Law & Justice Shri Arjun Ram Meghwal in his keynote address at the ITAT Kolkata inauguration (7 September 2026) cited landmark ITAT rulings starting with one Ms. Moksha Mahajan&#39;s ruling that clarified how "....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....capital incentives/ receipts" must be distinguished from taxable "income", underscoring ITAT&#39;s role in shaping fiscal justice. Now, let&#39;s understand difference between "capital expenditure" and "revenue expenditure" from The ITAT Mumbai&#39;s Ruling in Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, 14 (1) (2) Mumbai Versus Deugro Projects (India) Private Limited -&nbsp;2026 (8) TMI 1641 - ITAT M....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....UMBAI which held that recurring trademark fees linked to profits do not create an enduring asset and hence cannot be capitalised. The jurisprudence on distinguishing capital expenditure from revenue expenditure has been shaped by the Supreme Court in cases like Commissioner of Income-Tax, Bombay City I Versus Ciba of India Limited -&nbsp;1967 (12) TMI 3 - Supreme Court&nbsp;and Alembic Chemical Wo....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....rks Company Limited Versus Commissioner of Income-Tax, Gujarat -&nbsp;1989 (3) TMI 5 - Supreme Court. These rulings established that payments for trademarks or technical know-how, without transfer of ownership, are revenue in nature. The ITAT Mumbai applied this principle This jurisprudence resonates with the broader distinction between capital receipts and income, highlighted by Hon&#39;ble Mi....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nister of Law & Justice Shri Arjun Ram Meghwal in his keynote address at the ITAT Kolkata inauguration. Linking the Threads • Capital Expenditure vs. Revenue Expenditure (ITAT Mumbai): Payments for trademark usage are operational costs, not asset-creating outlays. • Capital Receipt vs. Income (Minister Meghwal): Incentives or subsidies received for capital purposes (e.....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....g., setting up industry) are capital receipts, not taxable income. • Common Principle: Both distinctions hinge on whether the transaction creates or transfers an enduring asset/right. If ownership or proprietary interest is acquired, it is capital; if not, it remains revenue or income. The ITAT Mumbai ruling strengthens the jurisprudence that trademark fees paid under licensing agr....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....eements are revenue in nature. The assessee merely enjoys a contractual right of use, not ownership. As the Tribunal noted, "state-of-the-art technology of modern times can neither be deemed permanent nor of an enduring nature." For businesses, this provides clarity: licensing costs for trademarks and know-how are deductible under Section 37(1), provided ownership remains with the licensor. For th....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e Revenue, the lesson is equally clear - brand usage fees cannot be capitalised unless proprietary rights are transferred. This jurisprudence, rooted in Supreme Court authority, continues to safeguard taxpayers against unwarranted capitalisation of genuine business expenses. The ITAT Mumbai ruling and Minister Meghwal&#39;s speech thus converge on a single jurisprudential axis: the distinction ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....between capital and revenue income/expenditure is foundational to tax justice. Whether in expenditure or receipts, the test remains whether the assessee acquires an enduring asset or proprietary right. Thus, recurring trademark fees cannot be capitalised, and capital incentives cannot be taxed as income. Together, these rulings and policy reflections reinforce ITAT&#39;s motto of "Nishpaksh Sulabh....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Satvar Nyay" - impartial, accessible, and swift justice for taxpayers. =============<br> Scholarly articles for knowledge sharing by authors, experts, professionals ....