2026 (9) TMI 1933
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....lant(s): Mr. Amit Sibal, Sr. Adv., Ms. Prachi Johri, AOR, Mr. Sachin Jain, Adv., Mr. Himanshu Sharma, Adv., Mr. Saksham Dhingra, Adv., Ms. Smriti Nair, Adv., Ms. Suditi Batra, Adv. For the Respondent(s): M/S. Kmnp Law, AOR, Mr. Rohan Thawani, Adv., Mr. V. Shyamohan, Adv., Ms. Sradhaxna Mudrika, Adv., Ms. Anshika Bajpai, Adv., Mr. Dhruv Mehta, Sr. Adv., Ms. Pooja Mahajan, Adv., Ms. Arveena Sharm....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....l before the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT), by the impugned order, the NCLAT found that the IBC constitutes the CoC and RP as different entities and have assigned them different roles and specific responsibilities. However, it affirmed the order of the NCLT that CoC was not a necessary party in IA No.466 of 2025. We had granted a stay in the matter. 3. We heard Sri Amit Sibal,....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....oncerned and orders passed as expeditiously as possible. 5. On consent of all parties, we direct that IA No.466 of 2025, which is reserved for orders, be placed on board of the NCLT on any date within two weeks from today and the appellant CoC be impleaded therein. The appellant may also be heard expeditiously, and we direct the NCLT to dispose of the matter as expeditiously as possible. To fac....
TaxTMI