Loading...

⚠ ✕
❮ Top
☎ Help
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback✕

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2026 (9) TMI 1992

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....dra Srivastava For the Respondent(s) : C.S.C. ORDER 1. Heard Sri Yogesh Chandra Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the respondents. 2. The dispute raised in the present writ petition is with regard to the fact that the petitioner's company was granted work contract by the respondents for the financial years 2019-2020, 2020-2021, 2....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....n addition, but while making payment of the work done for the financial years 2019-2020, 2020-2021 and 2021-2022, 12% GST was not paid. 5. The dispute in the present case is that the petitioner gave representations to the respondents for reimbursement of GST to the petitioner, which has been deposited by the petitioner, but the said representations have not been decided. 6. In view of above,....