Loading...

⚠ ✕
❮ Top
☎ Help
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback✕

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2026 (9) TMI 1765

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.....08.2017 that gold of foreign origin in a huge quantity was going to be carried by two persons, namely, Sanjay Saw and Asish Kumar Chakraborty, appellant numbers 1 and 3 respectively, to a melting shop in Bowbazar, Kolkata, a team of Officers of Headquarter P&I Branch of the Customs intercepted the appellant number 3 near Nimtala Ghat Street. 2. On being questioned, Shri Asish Kumar Chakraborty / appellant no. 3 admitted that he was carrying nine (09) numbers of gold biscuits / bars of foreign origin wrapped in newspaper which he was taking to a melting shop at Bowbazar, Kolkata. He further informed that he is an employee of a gold shop at Nimatala Ghat Street, Kolkata. 3. Accordingly, the said shop premises was also searched, during ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....tice dated 16.08.2017 was issued to the appellants for absolute confiscation of the gold recovered and to impose penalty on the appellants. 8. Thereafter, by way of the Order-in-Original No. 99/ADC(P)/CUS/WB/2022-2023 dated 30.09.2022, apart from ordering absolute confiscation of the gold, a penalty of Rs. 4,00,000/- each was imposed on appellant numbers 1 and 3 and a penalty of Rs.10,00,000/- was imposed on the appellant number 2. 8.1. The said order was challenged by the appellants before the Ld. Commissioner (Appeals), who, vide the impugned order, affirmed the order passed by the adjudicating authority. 9. Aggrieved from the said order, appellants are before us, praying for reduction in the penalties imposed on them. 10. The....