Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2005 (3) TMI 277

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e credit of Rs. 33,044/- accrued to them after 15-8-2000 but utilised the same for payment of central excise duty for the first fortnight of August, 2000 on 19-8-2000. The Central Excise Audit party visited their premises for audit and pointed out this mistake. They accordingly debited the amount of Rs. 33,044/- from PLA vide Entry No. 29, dated 20-9-2001 and took equal amount of credit in their R....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....te for appellants states that the appellants have not taken a fresh credit or credit of an amount for which refund application was required. The appellants debited the required amount from PLA and same amount was taken as credit in Modvat credit account which was earlier debited incorrectly. He relied on the following decisions :- 1.      CCE, Chandigarh v. Kumar Auto C....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....iting of the amount cannot be denied only on the ground of non-seeking of permission of the Astt. Commissioner. 3.      Visakhapatnam Steel Plant v. CCE [2002 (149) E.L.T. 708 (Tribunal)]. where it was held in Para 7(c) that correction of accounting entries are required to be made as per Rule 226 (ii) with sanction of and in presence of proper officer. 3. On consi....