Loading...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2026 (9) TMI 1572

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....DER (ORAL) Per: Arun Monga, J. 1. Petitioner herein, inter alia, seeks quashing of the impugned adjudication order dated 05.12.2025, passed under Section 73 of the CGST/RGST Act, 2017, whereby the total demand amounting to Rs. 7,14,803/- was confirmed against the petitioner. The petitioner further seeks quashing of the Rectification Rejection Order dated 05.05.2026 passed by the Deputy Commissioner, State Tax, Circle-H, Jaipur-I, under Section 161 of the CGST/RGST Act, 2017, whereby the petitioner's application for rectification was rejected on the ground of limitation, despite the petitioner having demonstrated that the actual excess ITC liability was only Rs. 1,90,318.78/-, which had already been discharged through Form GST DRC-03 d....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e rectification application was rejected vide order dated 05.05.2026 on the ground of limitation and on the premise that the issues raised fell beyond the scope of Section 161, despite the application having been filed within six months of the order dated 05.12.2025. They submit that no notice fixing any date, time or venue of personal hearing was issued and no effective opportunity of hearing was afforded to the petitioner. The petitioner accordingly challenges the orders dated 05.12.2025 and 05.05.2026. 3. Heard and perused the case file. 4. At the outset, learned counsels for the respondents object to the maintainability of the writ petition herein stating that the alternative remedy as provided under Section 107 of the CGST Act, 2....