Loading...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2026 (9) TMI 1213

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....pellant : Shri S. P. Siddhanta, Advocate For the Respondent : Shri D. Sue, Authorized Representative ORDER PER SHRI ASHOK JINDAL: The appellant is in appeal against the impugned order. 2. The facts of the case are that on scrutiny of records and documents of the appellant, it was observed by the Revenue that they had not discharged their Service Tax liability on 'supply of manpo....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... job work; and the appellant being a manufacturer of excisable goods, was entitled to avail CENVAT Credit of Service Tax paid on any work related to manufacturing of dutiable final products; the ld. adjudicating authority thus observed that there could not be any ulterior motive to evade the payment of tax. 5. The said order was challenged before the Ld. Commissioner (Appeals). The Ld. Commissi....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....t. Further, it is also their case that being a revenue neutral situation, the impugned demands are unsustainable. 9. On the other hand, Ld. Authorized Representative of the Revenue has reiterated the findings in the impugned order. 10. Heard the parties and considered their submissions. 11. We find that, admittedly, in this case, whatever tax had to be paid by the appellant, the same was ....