Loading...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

Purchase genuineness established by records and banking evidence defeats additions based on third-party cheque realisation and wage presumptions.

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Purchase additions could not be sustained where the taxpayer produced ledgers, invoices, supplier details, registration particulars, bank statements and cheque counterfoils, while undisputed crossed-cheque payments were later realised by third parties. No legal bar then restricted crossed cheques, and the taxpayer could not control their endorsement; absent further inquiry, the High Court restored the first appellate authority's deletion. Wage disallowance based solely on presumed inflation and a doubtful wage register lacked evidentiary support. The High Court set aside the Tribunal's reduced disallowance and restored deletion of both additions; the gross-profit issue remained unanswered.....