2014 (10) TMI 1089

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....alram Das, Adv. Mr. Ratnakar Dash, Sr. Adv. Mr. Abhisth Kumar, Adv. Mr. Raman Yadav, Adv. Mr. Jasbir Singh Malik, Adv. Mr. B.P. Singh Dhakray, Adv. Mr. Shakti Singh Dhakray, Adv. Mr. Abhishek Pareek, Adv. for Mr. S.K. Sabharwal, Adv. ORDER 1. This application has been filed by the petitioner before us with the prayer to reopen the Review Petition (Crl.) No. 395 of 2014 and grant the petitioner an open hearing before a three Judge Bench of this Court in light of the decision of this Court in Mohd. Arif and others v. The Registrar, Supreme Court of India and Ors.(Writ Petition(Crl.) No. 77 of 2014) delivered on 02.09.2014. 2. The Constitution Bench of this Court in Mohd Arif case (supra) has carved out a separate niche of review peti....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....herefore, this case requires to be treated as exceptional and extraordinary requiring interference by this Court in exercise of its review jurisdiction. Shri Jethmalani would state that had the accused person been provided with a well experienced advocate during the Trial, the present conviction and sentence would neither have been recorded by the Trial Court nor confirmed by the appellate Courts. The case, according to him, would have reached a different conclusion. 6. We have perused the judgment and order passed by this Court and other relevant documents before us as pointed out by the learned senior counsel. 7. It is well settled that the scope of a Review Petition under Article 137 of the Constitution of India is very limited and....