Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2004 (10) TMI 252

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....s stated that the appellants have already reversed the entire Modvat credit involved in the present appeals. He has further stated that the appeals may be disposed of as the issue involved therein stands covered by the apex Court judgment in CCE, Jaipur v. J.K. Udaipur Udyog Ltd. [2004 (171) E.L.T. 289 (S.C.)]. Therefore, after allowing the waiver of the pre-deposit of penalty amount, I proceed to....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....he explosives used in mines as inputs by an assessee and that the apex Court has only recently in the above referred judgment, settled the law. Therefore, the penalty of Rs. 30,000/- imposed on the appellants be set aside. 4. The learned SDR has opposed the prayer. 5. I have gone through the record. It cannot be disputed that earlier the Tribunal itself had in some cases, allowed the Modvat ....