2026 (9) TMI 724
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....nbsp; For the Respondent nos. 1 to 3: Mr. Dilip Kumar Agarwal, Adv. Mr. Bishwa Raj Agarwal, Adv. For the Respondent no. 4: Mr. Milindo Paul, Adv. Mr. Nabankur Paul, Adv. Ms. Sutopa Senl Paul, Adv. Ms. Bedasruti Bose, Adv. Mr. Subham Das, Adv. Mr. Bodhisatya Ghosh, Adv. ORDER Re : I.A. No. CAN 1 OF 2026 1. Ms. Khushi Kundu, learned Advocate appears for the petitioner. ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....se of the existence of the interim order the revenue authority has been suffering irreparable prejudice. He further submits that, the private respondents are in nexus with the petitioner and since they have not filed affidavitin- opposition the hearing of the writ petition is unnecessarily delayed. 7. Mr. Nabankur Paul, learned Advocate appearing for the respondent no. 4 prays for an extension ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....sdictional Tribunal has already been constituted and is under operation. In this regard, he has relied upon and placed a notification dated March 23, 2026 issued by the Deputy Registrar, GSTAT, Kolkata, the same is taken on record. He submits that, the order impugned in this writ petition is appealable before the second appellate tribunal. 13. The petitioner and the respondent no. 4 submit that....
TaxTMI