Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2004 (12) TMI 195

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....or the appellant submitted that the penalty on the appellant has been imposed under Rule 209A of the Central Excise Rules, 1944. He submitted that the Provisions of the said rule clearly provide that the penalty can be imposed on the person, when he acquires possession of, or is in any way concerned in transporting, removing, keeping, selling or in any other manner deals with, any excisable goods ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....r any greater penalty than the main accused. In support of his contention he relied on the following decisions : - (i)       Star Paper Mills Ltd. - 2003 (151) E.L.T. 607 (Tri. - Del.). Penalty not imposable in the absence of confiscation of goods. (ii)      Ram Nath Singh - 2003 (151) E.L.T. 451 (Tri. - Del.). Penalty under Rule 209A no....