Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

Whether Interest is Payable on ITC Reversal under Rule 37 when Sufficient Balance Exists in Electronic Credit Ledger?

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....hether Interest is Payable on ITC Reversal under Rule 37 when Sufficient Balance Exists in Electronic Credit Ledger?<br> Query (Issue) Started By: - Piyush Choudhary Dated:- 24-8-2026 Goods and Services Tax - GST<br>GST<br>Dear Experts, We seek your views on the following GST issue: A registered person has availed Input Tax Credit (ITC) on certain vendor invoices. However, payment to some ve....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ndors could not be made within 180 days from the date of invoice, requiring reversal of ITC in terms of Section 16(2) of the CGST Act read with Rule 37 of the CGST Rules. In the relevant period: • The taxpayer had sufficient balance in the Electronic Credit Ledger at all times. • The reversed ITC was never utilized for payment of output tax liability, as adequate ITC b....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....alance remained available throughout. • ITC is proposed to be reversed after the expiry of 180 days due to non-payment to vendors. Query: • Whether interest under Section 50 is payable on such ITC reversal mandated under Rule 37, even when sufficient balance was available in the Electronic Credit Ledger throughout the period? • Can it be argued that since ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....the credit was merely availed but not utilized, and sufficient credit balance existed at all times, no interest liability should arise? • Are there any judicial precedents, departmental clarifications, or advance rulings supporting the view that interest is payable only when wrongly availed ITC is utilized, and not merely on account of Rule 37 reversal where adequate ITC balance exist....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....s? • Has any distinction been drawn by courts between "reversal due to non-payment within 180 days" and "wrongful availment/utilization of ITC" for the purpose of interest liability? Request experts to share their views along with relevant case laws, circulars, or statutory references. Thank you.<br> Discussion Forum - Knowledge Sharing ....