Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2026 (8) TMI 1370

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... 2. The petitioner has filed the present petition being aggrieved by the order dated 29.04.2024, issued by the Superintendent of CGST, Naharlagun Zone-I, Itanagar Range, whereby, the GST registration of the petitioner has been cancelled. 3. Since the similar matter has been disposed of by the coordinate benches of this Court, vide order dated 29.04.2025, passed in WP(C)179(AP)/2026 (Rakhe Achi Vs. Union of India & Ors.) and vide order dated 22.06.2026 in WP(C)274/2026 (Tai Miri vs. Union of India & Ors.) and as agreed to by the learned counsel for the parties, the writ petition is taken up for disposal at the motion stage in a similar way. 4. The petitioner is engaged in carrying on multiple businesses including construction, hardware....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ng of returns. 8. Mr. T. Lampung, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that since the cancellation order was passed on 29.04.2024 and the statutory period for seeking revocation has already expired, coupled with the restriction on filing returns after the expiry of three years from the due date, the petitioner is presently unable to file the pending returns and discharge his tax liabilities through the GST portal. 9. Mr. Lampung, learned counsel for the petitioner, by referring to the order dated 29.04.2025, passed in WP(C)179(AP)/2026 (Rakhe Achi Vs. Union of India & Ors.), and order dated 22.06.2026 passed in WP(C) 274(AP)/2026, (Tai Miri vs. Union of India & Ors.), wherein, the coordinate benches of this Court has passed con....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....y tax and other dues. 13. Having considered the submissions of the learned counsel for the parties, as well as the orders dated 29.04.2025 and 22.06.2026 passed in the cases of Rakhe Achi (supra) and Tai Miri (supra), respectively, I am of the considered view that the cases relied upon by the learned counsel for the petitioner squarely covers the case of the petitioner. 14. In view of the above, I am of the view that the petitioner is entitled to be granted similar relief. Accordingly, this writ petition is allowed with the following orders: i) The Superintendent of CGST, Naharlagun Zone-I, Itanagar Range GST (respondent No. 3), shall intimate the petitioner with regard to his total statutory outstanding dues, if any, in the ....