Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2004 (9) TMI 181

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....m, Vice-President]. - The appeal arises out of the order of the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals) rejecting the claim of refund of Rs. 37,68,834/- as barred by limitation, rejecting the appellants' plea that duty was paid under protest and therefore, the claim for refund was not barred by limitation. 2. We have heard both sides. We find from the adjudication order that duty was paid unde....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....reference was not exactly polyurethene foam falling under Tariff Heading 3921.11 and hence not liable for licence control. It is the submission of the appellants that the requirement of Rule 233B had been complied with by them (a) by lodging a letter of protest; and (b) the Assistant Commissioner's acceptance that the duty was paid under protest. On accumulative reading of the Superintendent's let....