2018 (7) TMI 2395

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....;Mr L R Poojari, Addl. Public Prosecutor(2) ORAL ORDER 1. Present application is preferred by the applicant being aggrieved by the continuation of the condition Nos. 3 and 4 in the order dated 14.03.2005 passed in Criminal Misc. Application (for regular bail) No.66 of 2005 by the Court of learned Additional Sessions Judge (Fast Track Court No. 4), Bhuj, District Kutch. The applicant had move....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... was released eventually by the Court of learned Additional Sessions Judge on 14.03.2005 in Criminal Misc. Application No.66 of 2005. 4. It is the say of the applicant that the show cause notice was issued by the Commissioner of Customs, Kandla which was adjudicated by the adjudicating authority against which the applicant had preferred appeal before the CESTAT, Ahmedabad which remanded the mat....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ose is going to be served to continue the condition Nos.3 and 4 as were imposed by the Court of learned Additional Sessions Judge. 7. This Court has heard learned advocate, Mr. Chetan Pandya appearing for the applicant who has urged that the maximum punishment is of seven years and the offence is non- cognizable and bailable in the year 2005. He has further urged that the process is taking a lo....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....are appropriately placed as after once the CESTAT, Ahmedabad decides, the authority generally is deciding for the prosecution part. He has urged that it may still take about six to eight months time for the authority to decide as to what course is taking. 9. Having heard learned advocates on both the sides and also noticing the fact that the applicant has already deposited the sum of Rs. 1.5 Cr....