2026 (8) TMI 838

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....esent:   For the Petitioner: Mr. Mukul Singla, Advocate. For the Respondents-UOI: Mr. Sourabh Goel, Senior Standing Counsel. ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA, A.C.J. (ORAL) 1. The petitioner is a Company registered under the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013, which is having a manufacturing unit at Jharli, Haryana, where it manufactures cement. It approached this Court with the grievance ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....n 27.03.2026. It does not appear that any date for hearing etc. has been fixed. In such circumstances, this Court is required to consider as to whether the amount of refund can be denied to the petitioner only because an appeal has been preferred by the Revenue before the Appellate Tribunal. 4. Admittedly, the petitioner is a company and is engaged in manufacturing of cement. The petitioner can....