2025 (11) TMI 2048
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... Mr. T. Chezhiyan, Adv. Mr. Puppala Santhosh Kumar, Adv. Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Adv. Mr. Mukesh Kumar, AOR For Respondent :None ORDER 1. Delay condoned. 2. These petitions arise from a common order passed by the High Court for the State of Telangana (Special Original Jurisdiction) dated 16.12.2024 in Writ Petition Nos.35202 of 2024 and 34836 of 2024 respectively....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....n them to show cause as to why the contraband gold should not be confiscated and penalty be imposed for the illegal import of gold in violation of the provisions of Section 112 of the Customs Act, 1962. The show cause notices were adjudicated and ultimately final order of confiscation of gold came to be passed with imposition of penalty. 5. Instead of challenging the order in original passed by....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....visions of the Customs Act, 1962, we are of the view that no error not to speak of any error of law could be said to have been committed by the High Court while passing the impugned orders. However, we permit the petitioners - herein to prefer statutory appeal under Section 128 of the Customs Act, 1962 within a period of two weeks from today. 9. If any such appeal is filed by the petitioners, t....
TaxTMI