Admitted cheque signatures raise debt presumptions, while revisional courts cannot reassess concurrent evidence without material jurisdictional error.

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Admitted cheque signatures trigger presumptions of consideration and discharge of a legally enforceable debt or liability under the Negotiable Instruments Act. The notes explain that an accused alleging misuse of a blank security cheque must rebut those presumptions with credible material; unsupported assertions, delayed demands for return of the cheque, and unsubstantiated challenges to the complainant's financial capacity may be insufficient. They further state that revisional jurisdiction is supervisory, not appellate: concurrent findings should not be reversed through fresh reappreciation of evidence unless perversity, material error, failure to consider relevant evidence, or miscarriage of justice is shown.....