2026 (8) TMI 230

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....VINOD CHANDRAN For the Petitioner(s): Mr. S. Nagamuthu, Sr. Adv., Mr. M.P. Parthiban, AOR, Ms. Priyaranjani Nagamuthu, Adv., Mr. Bilal Mansoor, Adv., Mr. Shreyas Kaushal, Adv., Mr. S. Geyolin Selvam, Adv., Mr. Alagiri K, Adv., Mr. Shivansh Sharma, Adv., Mr. Abhishek S, Adv. For the Respondent(s): None.   ORDER 1. The petitioner is a University concerned with a show cause notice is....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... 'services relating to admissions to, or conduct of examination by an educational institution'. Having answered the reference, the operative portion of the impugned judgment indicates that the matter was remanded to the learned Single Judge to decide the residual issues. 3. Sri S. Nagamuthu, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the University submits that there are conflicting decisions from va....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Judge to consider the residual grounds, we are of the opinion that let the matter be considered by the learned Single Judge and then it would be open for the petitioner to challenge any order prejudicial to the petitioner along with the decision of the Division Bench in the reference, before this Court. 5. We also make it clear that in the meanwhile if this Court holds in favour of the assessee....