2026 (8) TMI 26

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....v., Mr. Hardik Bedi, Adv., Mr. Siddhant Buxy, AOR. ORDER 1. The special leave petition is directed against the order dated 29.03.2021 passed in O.S.A. No. 4 of 2020 by the High Court of Karnataka, at Bengaluru. 2. The O.S.A. was filed with a delay of 1808 days, challenging the order dated 02.06.2015, passed in Company Application No. 1409 of 2014 under Company Petition No. 66 of 1997. 3. Through the impugned order, the prayer for condonation of delay has been rejected. Hence, the special leave petition. 4. The above is both the introduction and also concludes the present special leave petition for the request for condonation was rejected for valid reasons. But the crux of the matter lies in between. 5. Respondent No. 1 is ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....that academic year and thereafter, the third respondent shall quit and deliver vacant possession. Ordered accordingly." 6. The first respondent, vide sale deed dated 05.05.2018, has become the owner after complying with all the obligations in the purchase of the property of the first respondent. Thereafter, the first respondent has filed Company Application No. 293 of 2018 and in specific terms, now, the first respondent, who has stepped into the shoes of M/s. Gangavathi Sugar Mills Limited prays before the Company Court the following prayer: "WHEREFORE, the applicant respectfully prays that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to direct the respondent No.2 to quit and deliver vacant possession of the land measuring about ....