2025 (11) TMI 2037

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... AND JATINDRANATH SWAIN MEMBER (TECHNICAL) For the Appellant : Mr. Vinay Mathew Joseph, Advocate For the Respondent : Mr. Vinod PV, Ms. Reetha D & Mr. Akhil K M, Advocates for R1 Mr. Liju V Stephen, Advocate for R2 ORDER (Hybrid Mode) This Company Appeal (AT) (CH) (INS) No. 252 / 2025 was e-filed by the Appellant on 28.09.2024, thereby challenging the impugned order dated 14.08.2024....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e-filing of the Appeal. The said Application has been vehemently opposed by the Respondent No. 2 by submitting his written objection, and has submitted that, for the purposes of condonation of delay in re-filing too, there has to be a satisfactory explanation and none of the reasons, which has been given by the Appellant in para-3 of the said Application are satisfactory, which could call for a....