Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2025 (3) TMI 2060

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Ananya Kapoor, Adv. For the Revenue : Ms. Rini Handa, Sr. DR ORDER PER SATBEER SINGH GODARA, JUDICIAL MEMBER: This assessee's appeal for Assessment Year 2013-14, arises against the CIT(A), Moradabad's in case No. 307/ITO(E)/BLY/2015-16 dated 20.02.2017, in proceedings u/s 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short "the Act"). 2. Heard both the parties at length. Case file perused.....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....urther erred in law and facts of the case, by sustaining addition on account of outstanding creditors to the tune of Rs. 41,84272/- merely because the notices u/s 133(6) had remained unserved/no compliance made, and when the transactions with such creditors was never doubted at any stage of assessment/remand proceedings." 4. Learned counsel states very fairly that the assessee does not wish to ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... years which had opening balance of Rs. 87,48,000/- as on 01.04.2012. The assessee therefore appears to have raised it's impugned interest claim on accrual than on actual payment basis. 6. Faced with this situation, we hereby quote Chainrup Sampatram Vs. CIT (1953) 24 ITR 461 (SC) and Bharat Earth Movers Vs. CIT (2000) 245 ITR 428 (SC) that even such an anticipated interest liability on accrual....