Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2004 (3) TMI 166

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... per : S.L. Peeran, Member (J) (Oral)]. - Matter in all the four applications are common and therefore they are taken up together for hearing as per law. These miscellaneous applications have been filed by the Revenue seeking to introduce fresh evidence in the form of production of copies of test result, which was not before the lower authorities or the appellate authority. The contention of the R....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ed on the Revenue themselves. He relied by the decision of the Tribunal rendered in the case of United Machinery Works (P) Ltd. v. CCE [1995 (79) E.L.T. 477] wherein after looking into various judgments including Apex Court rulings, the Tribunal has held that request for production of additional evidence at belated stage is not permissible particularly when the same is produced to fill up any lacu....