2004 (3) TMI 119

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... - None appeared for the respondents. Heard Shri Sanjay Singhal, learned DR for the applicant Commissioner. In this case, the final order was passed by the Bench dismissing the appeal filed by the Revenue [2003 (156) E.L.T. 1029 (Tri.)]. One of the reasons for rejecting Revenue's appeal was that the earlier order of the Commissioner (Appeals) classifying the impugned goods under Heading No. 8414.8....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... the learned DR, but it was not brought to the notice of the Bench that the earlier order of the Commissioner (Appeals) was reversed in appeal. There is also no indication that other contrary decisions of the Tribunal were brought to the notice of the Bench. As such, we are unable to agree that the said order dated 7-8-2003 can now be changed through an application for rectification of mistake. Th....