2014 (7) TMI 1404

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.....S. Bopanna Sri Madhusudhan R. Naik, Sr. Counsel For Sri Abhishek Malipatil, Adv.  For Naik & Naik Law Firm) Sri B. Veerappa, G.A. For R1  Sri N.K. Ramesh, Adv. For R2-R. ORDER The petitioners are before this Court assailing the order dated 23.01.2014 impugned at Annexure-G to the petitions. The petitioners are also seeking for a declaration that the university cannot retain any quota nor the power of authority to notify any quota for itself or fix a fee structure with regard to the same. The condition No. 6 in the Affiliation notification is also assailed. Further, the admissions of the students made by the petitioners'- institution to the vacant seats as per the list of admissions at Annexures-H to H6 is sou....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....AT/ CAT/MAT". 4. The provision made therein would indicate that the unfilled/surrendered seats could be filled up by the college concerned in a transparent way as it is provided to revert back. Hence, the provision which has been made by the Government for the academic year 2014-15 onwards could also be taken note by this Court to consider the question raised in the instant petitions which pertains to the academic year 2013-14, since the object is to see that the available infrastructure is not wasted by allowing the seats in the permitted intake to lapse. If this aspect is kept in view and in a situation where the seats had not been filled up by the university to the extent it had retained, the admissions made by the petitioners in any ....