Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2025 (3) TMI 1911

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... For the Revenue / Respondent : Shri Bhangepatil Pushkaraj Ramesh, Sr. DR ORDER PER: NARENDRA KUMAR BILLAIYA, AM: This appeal by the Revenue is preferred against the order dated 22.05.2024 by National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi (for short "NFAC") pertaining to AY 2009-10. 2. The sum and substance of the grievance of the Revenue is that the CIT(A) erred in restricting the addition to....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....of the opinion that only the profit element embedded in such alleged bogus purchases should be added and accordingly restricted the addition to 12.5% thereby confirmed the addition of Rs. 10,50,472/-. 6. Before us, the ld. DR strongly supported the findings of the AO. The Counsel drew our attention to the decision of the Co-ordinate Bench in the case of the assessee in ITA No. 791/Mum/2024 and ....