2003 (10) TMI 232

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....(T)]. - The Commissioner (Customs), Kandla, is an appellant in all these appeals. The instant appeals have been filed on the basis of CBEC's Review Order under Section 129(D) (1) of the Customs Act, 1962. In the appeals, it has been pleaded that, though in the impugned order, the imported goods were held liable for confiscation under Section 111(o) of the Customs Act, 1962, for not observing the c....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... 110. In the impugned order, though the goods have been held to be liable for confiscation there was no seizure of the goods. Consequently there was no order to confiscate the goods. Unless the goods are seized there cannot be any confiscation thereof. In this connection, reference is invited to Section 126 of the Customs Act, which provides that, upon confiscation of the goods, the property shall....