Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

Limitation after initial seizure, lack of reason to believe, and failure of Section 123 defeated confiscation of gold.

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Limitation for the show cause notice ran from the first police seizure on a smuggling allegation, so Customs could not extend time by treating the later transfer of custody as a fresh seizure; the notice was therefore time-barred and void. The purported Customs seizure also failed because reason to believe, the jurisdictional basis for seizure, was not shown on objective pre-seizure material. Section 123 did not apply because foreign origin was never established. The retracted custodial police statement was discarded for lack of independent corroboration, while family statements and the purchase receipt supported licit ancestral ownership. Confiscation and penalties under the Customs Act accordingly failed and the gold was directed to be released.....