2026 (7) TMI 141
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....n Gupta, learned counsel appearing for the Appellant. 2. This appeal has been preferred under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, against the judgment and order dated 20th December, 2018, passed by the learned Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (for short "I.T.A.T"), Mumbai in Appeal No.2555/ Mum/2018 (A.Y. 2009-10), whereby, the appeal preferred by the Assessee/Respondent was partly allowed. ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... 4. The Revenue is before this Court by filing the present appeal against the order dated 20th December, 2018, seeking enhancement of the amount. 5. Mr. Arjun Gupta, learned counsel for the Appellant while addressing arguments has submitted in his usual fairness that Revenue did not prefer any appeal against the order of the CIT (Appeals). As such, in view of the order of the Co-ordinate Bench ....
TaxTMI