Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2003 (12) TMI 146

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....hana Wadhwa, Member (J)]. - The short dispute in the present appeal is the correct classification of the printed plastic films. Whereas the Revenue has classified the product under Heading 3920.39 as printed plastic, the appellants' contention is that the product is properly classifiable under Chapter Heading 4901.90. 2. Shri Patil, learned Advocate appearing for the appellants submit that the ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ted in Damman. The appellants' contention is that the above distinction made by the Commissioner does not stand to any valid reason inasmuch as the issue stands finally concluded by the Tribunal. Mr. Patil submits that against the said order no appeal has been filed before any higher authority by the Revenue. 3. After hearing the learned SDR we find that the Commissioner in his impugned order h....