TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2026 (6) TMI 972
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... the Asst. Year 2019-20, the assessee filed his original Return of Income on 30-08-2019 admitting the gross total income of Rs. 1,31,87,028/-. The assessee filed a revised Return of Income on 16-04-2020 along with Form No. 67 on Foreign Tax Credit. Due to Covid-19 pandemic period the due date for filing the Return of Income for Asst. Year 2019-20 was extended up to 31-03-2020. However the assessee filed a revised return on 16-04-2020 along with Form No. 67. The revised return was processed u/s. 143(1) and denied the benefit of Foreign Tax Credit on the ground that Form No. 67 was filed belatedly and thereby demanded tax. 3. Aggrieved against the same, assessee filed an appeal before Ld. Add./Jt. CIT(A) who has confirmed the addition made by CPC and dismissed the assessee appeal. 4. Aggrieved against the same, the assessee is in appeal before us. We have heard rival submissions and perused the materials available on record. It is an undisputed fact that the assessee filed Form No. 67 belatedly. The Co-ordinate Bench of this Tribunal in the case of Sanjay Patil vs. A.O. in ITA No. 189/SRT/2021 vide order dated 18-05-2022, wherein it was that non-filing of Form No. 67 before the....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....o tax in India." One of the requirements of Rule 128 for claiming FTC is provided by Rule 128 (8) & (9) of the Rules and the same reads thus: "(8) Credit of any foreign tax shall be allowed on furnishing the following documents by the assessee, namely:- (i) a statement of income from the country or specified territory outside India offered for tax for the previous year and of foreign tax deducted or paid on such income in Form No.67 and verified in the manner specified therein; (ii) certificate or statement specifying the nature of income and the amount of tax deducted therefrom or paid by the assessee,- (a) from the tax authority of the country or the specified territory outside India; or (b) from the person responsible for deduction of such tax; or (c) signed by the assessee: Provided that the statement furnished by the assessee in clause (c) shall be valid if it is accompanied by,- (A) an acknowledgement of online payment or bank counter foil or challan for payment of tax where the payment has been made by the assessee; (B) proof of deduction where the tax has been deducted. (9) Th....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....nt in the present context. Same is extracted below: "4. In the case of India, double taxation shall be avoided as follows: (a) the amount of Australian tax paid under the laws of Australia and in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement, whether directly or by deduction, by a resident of India in respect of income from sources within Australia which has been subjected to tax both in India and Australia shall be allowed as a credit against the Indian tax payable in respect of such income but in an amount not exceeding that proportion of Indian tax which such income bears to the entire income chargeable to Indian tax;" It was submitted by him that section 90 of the Act read with Article 24(4)(a) provides that Australian tax paid shall be allowed as a credit against the Indian tax but limited to proportion of Indian tax. Neither section 90 nor DTAA provides that FTC shall be disallowed for non-compliance with any procedural requirements. FTC is Assessee's vested right as per Article 24(4)(a) of the DTAA read with Section 90 and same cannot be disallowed for non-compliance of procedural requirement that is prescribed in the Rules. 8. It was f....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... Deputy Commissioner, (1992 Supp (1) Supreme Court Cases 21) wherein it observed that: "The mere fact that it is statutory does not matter one way or the other. There are conditions and conditions. Some may be substantive, mandatory and based on considerations of policy and some others may merely belong to the area of procedure. It will be erroneous to attach equal importance to the non-observance of all conditions irrespective of the purposes they were intended to serve." Further reliance was placed on the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court, in the case of Sambhaji and Others v. Gangabai and Others, reported in (2008) 17 SCC 117, wherein it has been held that procedure cannot be a tyrant but only a servant. It is not an obstruction in the implementation of the provisions of the Act, but an aid. The procedures are handmaid and not the mistress. It is a lubricant and not a resistance. A procedural law should not ordinarily be construed as mandatory; the procedural law is always subservient to and is in aid to justice. It was submitted that filing of Form 67 as per the provisions of section 90 read with Rule 128(9) is a procedural law and should not control the c....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....nt on the face of the record. 15. In his rejoinder, the learned counsel for the Assessee submitted that Form No.67 was available before the AO when the intimation u/s.143(1) of the Act dated 28.5.2020 was passed. He pointed out that the AO or the CIT(A) did not dismiss the Assessee application for rectification u/s.154 of the Act on the ground that the issue was debatable but rather the decision was given that the relevant rule was mandatory and hence non-furnishing of Form No.67 before the due date u/s.139(1) of the Act was fatal to the claim for FTC. 16. I have given a careful consideration to the rival submissions. I agree with the contentions put forth by the learned counsel for the Assessee and hold that (i) Rule 128(9) of the Rules does not provide for disallowance of FTC in case of delay in filing Form No.67; (ii) filing of Form No.67 is not mandatory but a directory requirement and (iii) DTAA overrides the provisions of the Act and the Rules cannot be contrary to the Act. I am of the view that the issue was not debatable and there was only one view possible on the issue which is the view set out above. I am also of the view that the issue in the proceeding....