2026 (6) TMI 794

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....eraj Kishan Kaul, Sr. Adv., Mr. Rishi Agrawala,, Adv., Ms. Misha Rohatgi, AOR, Ms. Suhrita Majumdar, Adv., Mr. Kironjit B. Majumder, Adv., Mr. Ankur Saigal,, Adv., Ms. Sukriti Bhatnagar, Adv., Mr. Nakul Mohta,, Adv., Ms. Saijal Arora,, Adv., Mr. Dipro Dawn,, Adv., Ms. Anushree Kapooria, Adv., Ms. Ira Mahajan,, Adv., Ms. Sneha Menon, Adv., Ms. Sayani De, Adv. ORDER Leave granted. 2. Pursuant to our order dated 25.05.2026, learned senior counsel for the appellant has filed the affidavit of Sri Radhakrishnanan, Chief Business Officer-India & SAARC-Automotive and Home Energy of the appellant. 3. The said affidavit is taken on record and the same reads as under: "AFFIDAVIT ON BEHALF OF THE PETITIONER IN COMPLIANCE OF ORDER D....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....th the retailers. However, on an estimate based on information collected from Petitioner's distributors/ franchisees, to the best of Petitioner's knowledge, the inventory lying unsold with such retailers as on 25.05.2026 is estimated to be approximately 81,000 units, with an estimated value of Rs.15.60 crores. 6. I say that the last date of manufacture of the Subject Product by the Petitioner was 29.03.2026. There has been no production after the Impugned Order dated 02.04.2026. The last date on which the Subject Product was sent to distributors/ franchisees was 31.03.2026. Accordingly, the last invoice issued by the Petitioner for Subject Product is dated 31.03.2026. Should there be any doubt at any stage, it would always ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....affidavit is concerned, we state that the existing stock could be marketed by the appellant-company in any other package which is not red in colour or which is not similar to the packaging of respondent's product. It is stated that the appellant is in possession of 20,789 units of the subject Product valued around Rs.2.63 crores. Insofar as 1,44,547 empty cartons which are claimed to be similar to the carton/packaging of the respondent-product is concerned, we direct that the said number of empty cartons be destroyed and not utilised and therefore, the temporary injunction insofar as those empty cartons are concerned, shall continue. 7. We have perused the contents of paragrphs 4 to 7 of the affidavit. 8. We note that the unsold produ....