2026 (6) TMI 787

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....itioner : Mr. G. Natarajan For the Respondent : Mr. P. Rajagopalan Standing Counsel ORDER The writ petition has been filed seeking issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to quash the impugned order dated 25.06.2025 and consequently to direct the respondent to sanction the refund as claimed by the petitioner. 2. Upon hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner and perusing the....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....tion, the petitioner was unable to process the refund claim through the automated system on the common portal, resulting in rejection of the claim. Aggrieved thereby, the petitioner has approached this Court. 4. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the denial of refund is solely on account of an inadvertent error committed by the supplier, for which the petitioner ought not ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....either side and perused the materials available on record. 7. In view of the submissions made and the fact that the difficulty appears to have arisen on account of a classification error committed by the supplier, this Court is of the view that the petitioner should be afforded an opportunity to have the claim reconsidered on merits. 8. Accordingly, the impugned order dated 25.06.2025 is set....