2024 (11) TMI 1649

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....d Sections 25/27 of the Arms Act, 1959. 2. At the outset, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State submits that the bail application of the applicant, being, BAIL APPLN. 1170/2024, was dismissed by this Court on merits by order dated 04.04.2024. 3. He points out that thereafter the applicant had preferred another bail application, being, BAIL APPLN. 2007/2024, which was also dismissed on 02.07.2024. He submits that no fresh ground or change in circumstances has been pleaded by the applicant in the present application. 4. The learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant was falsely implicated in the present case. 5. He submits that the applicant was granted interim bail on 06.08.2024 by the learned T....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....he conditions as imposed by this Court, his compliance with the conditions cannot be termed as a circumstance which would allow the applicant to maintain a subsequent bail application. xxx 13. If the argument advanced by the learned counsel for the applicant is accepted, then under trial accused persons would become entitled to bail even after their bail is dismissed merely because they do not flout the conditions imposed while granting interim bail. 14. When the bail application filed by the applicant has been dismissed on merits, this Court cannot review the said order and reappreciate the evidence 15. Though the applicant has the right to file successive bail applications, the same can only be entertai....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... applicant before this Court was dismissed on 04.04.2024 after considering the diametrically opposite stand taken by the victim and his brother. It was noted that the corroborated part of a hostile witnesses testimony can be relied upon. This Court had also taken into account the gravity of the offence and the nature of the antecedents of the applicant. Reliance was also placed on the judgment of the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Gudikanti Narasimhulu v. Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P. : (1978) 1 SCC 240 where it was held that a thoughtless bail to habitual criminals enables them to indulge in further crimes and exploit the liberty. 10. The applicant is involved in multiple cases of serious nature, involving offences of theft a....