Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2025 (11) TMI 2005

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....the Respondent : A.S.G.I., Parv Agarwal, Sanjay Dwivedi. ORDER 1. Heard Sri Nishant Mishra alongwith Sri Tanmay Sadh learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Parv Agarwal learned counsel for the revenue and Sri Sanjay Dwivedi learned counsel for respondent No. 3. 2. Prayer has been made to challenge the seizure order dated 03.11.2025. Other prayers have also been made for provisional ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ative remedy of seeking provisional release of the goods before the statutory authority under Section 110A of the Customs Act, 1962. Versus 6. Having heard learned counsel for parties and having perused the record, it is noticeable that the seizure order was passed after about more than two months from the date of detention of the goods. That delay is significant. Its reasons are not known, at ....