2026 (5) TMI 1585
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....the Appellant(s): Mr. Raj Bahadur Yadav, AOR, Mr. B. Krishna Prasad, AOR, Mr. N. Venkataraman, A.S.G., Mr. Gurmeet Singh Makker, AOR, Mr. Arijit Prasad, Adv., Ms. Nisha Bagchi, Adv., Mr. Raghvendra S Srivatsa, Adv., Mr. Ishaan Sharma, Adv. For the Respondent(s): Mr. V Lakshmikumaran, Adv., Ms. Charanya Lakshmikumaran, AOR, Mr. Swastik Mishra, Adv., Ms. Nitum Jain, Adv., Ms. Neha Choudhary, Adv.....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... HIGH COURT 1.It is stated that along with Civil Appeal No. 21847/2017, this matter had already been dismissed on the ground of low tax effect. However, from the ROPs of this proceeding, we do not find the said order being reflected. 2.As such, we reiterate that on account of low tax effect, the Special Leave Petition is dismissed. Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 35552/2013 - 2012 (4) ....
TaxTMI