TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2026 (5) TMI 1596
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....eswani, Mr. Gopal Thakur, Mr. Hasmukh Thakur and Mr. Roshan Sheth. It was alleged that the accused with the intention to deceive, gained Mr. Pariyani's trust and induced him to buy a flat in a Monarch Group project, promoting him to pay Rs. 7 Crores. To make the transactions appear legitimate, they provided allotment letter, an agreement for sale, an irrevocable power of attorney, a possession letter and a no-lien letter. However, the flat was sold to another person. 3. The other FIR was registered on 27.10.2016 at Naupada Police Station for the offences under Section 406, 420, 468, 471 read with 120B of IPC. It was based on the complaint of Mr. Ashok Ratanlal Agarwal, Senior Vice President of M/s Capri Global Capital Limited ("CGCL") against Mr. Hasmukh Thakur, Mr. Gopal Thakur and others. It was alleged that the accused obtained a loan of Rs. 45 Crore from CGCL on 09.12.2013 for their two projects, M/s Monarch Brookfield and M/s Monarch Imperial by mortgaging 113 flats of Monarch Brookfield and 103 flats of Monarch Imperial. An amount of Rs. 40 Crore was disbursed between 29.12.2013 and 07.01.2014 on a condition that proceeds of sale of the flats would be deposited in the desi....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....n considered to be proceeds of crime and for that reason also, impugned order be set-aside. 9. Ld. Counsel for the appellant did not raise any other argument, despite an opportunity given by this Tribunal to raise any legal or factual issue. Ld. Counsel for the appellant, however, submitted that no other argument is required to be raised other than referred to above and he closed his argument. Arguments of the Ld. Counsel for the respondent: 10. Ld. Counsel for the respondent contested the appeal and raised elaborate arguments on each issue raised by the appellant. It would be referred while recording finding in reference to the issues raised by the appellant. It is to avoid repetition of one and the same fact and for the sake of brevity. Findings of the Tribunal: 11. I have considered the rival submissions of the parties and scanned the matter carefully. It is a case which involves number of FIRs against the main accused M/s Monarch Builders and related parties for commission of predicate offence. The appellant is recipient of proceeds of crime from the accused company. The property of equivalent value has been attached in view of the fact that the proceed was not f....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....13.11.2024 held it to be not laying down a good law. Relevant para of the said judgment is quoted hereunder: "3.2. In light of the Division Bench's judgment in Seema Garg's case (supra), this Bench would have been obligated to either follow it or refer the matter to a Larger Bench. However, the Supreme Court in Vijay Madanlal Chaudhary's case (supra) has interpreted the provision in para 298, which is extracted as under: "It was also urged before us that the attachment of property must be equivalent in value of the proceeds of crime only if the proceeds of crime are situated outside India. This argument, in our opinion, is tenuous. For, the definition of "proceeds of crime" is wide enough to not only refer to the property derived or obtained as a result of criminal activity relating to a scheduled offence, but also of the value of any such property. If the property is taken or held outside the country, even in such a case, the property equivalent in value held within the country or abroad can be proceeded with. The definition of "property" as in Section 2(1)(v) is equally wide enough to encompass the value of the property of proceeds of crime. Such int....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... proceeds of crime has undergone transformative changes from time to time so as to include all the complex acts involved in the offence of money laundering. 3.5. In Axis Bank's case (Supra), the Delhi High Court has dissected the definition in three parts while covering tainted property and untainted property held in India; and the 'proceeds of crime' taken out of the country or any other property of equivalent value thereof. However, this Court is of the considered view that the definition can be divided into two broader categories namely tainted properties and untainted properties. The first part provides about the tainted properties derived or obtained directly or indirectly by any person as a result of criminal activity relating to a scheduled offence. Thereafter, the untainted properties are further divided into two parts; the first part deals with a situation where the property derived or obtained from 'proceeds of crime' is not traceable. In the aforesaid situation the competent authority is authorized to attach or confiscate any other property of accused, which is of the same value as that of the 'proceeds of crime'. The second sub-categ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....raf's case (supra), Delhi High Court inadvertently overlooked the sub- category (i) of second part of definition of 'proceeds of crime'. Similarly, Andhra Pradesh High Court in Kumar Pappu Singh's case (supra) was not properly assisted. Furthermore, the attention of Patna High Court was not drawn to part 2(i) in HDFC Bank's case (supra). Similar is the position in M/s. Himachal Amta Power Limited's case (supra). In this case, the attention of the Bench was not drawn to the second broader category of the definition. In Hemanshu Rajnikant Shah's case (supra) the Court relied upon Seema Garg's case (supra) and held that the properties acquired before the alleged crime and before the enforcement of the '2002 Act' cannot be attached. 3.9. On the other hand the judgments passed in Vijay Madanlal Chaudhary's case (supra), Axis Bank's case (supra) and Prakash Industries case (supra) completely answer the question in favour of ED. 3.10. The petitioner's counsel has also heavily relied upon Pavana Dibbur's case (supra). This Bench has carefully read the aforesaid judgment. The aforementioned case involved attachment of....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... thus.: "(u) "proceeds of crime" means any property derived or obtained, directly or indirectly, by any person as a result of criminal activity relating to a scheduled offence or the value of any such property [or where such property is taken or held outside the country, then the property equivalent in value held within the country or abroad; Explanation. For the removal of doubts, it is hereby clarified that "proceeds of crime" include property not only derived or obtained from the scheduled offence but also any property which may directly or indirectly be derived or obtained as a result of any criminal activity relatable to the scheduled offence;" 13. The perusal of the definition aforesaid shows three limbs. In between every limb word "or" has been used to divide the definition into three parts. The first part refers to the property acquired or derived directly or indirectly out of the criminal activities relating to the scheduled offence. In the first part, all those properties which are acquired directly or indirectly out of criminal activities would be termed to be the proceeds of crime. The properties can be acquired directly or indirectly with the....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....he reason that if the property acquired prior to commission of crime would not fall in the definition of "proceeds of crime", then the accused would commit the crime and immediately proceeds would be siphoned off or vanished so that it may not remain available for attachment. In fact, the word "the value of any such property" was inserted by the legislature to attach the property of equivalent value, if the proceeds out of commission of crime is not available or vanished. If the second limb of the definition is made dependent on the first limb, it would be literally re-writing the provision or making it redundant to a great extent and for this, jurisdiction does not lie with any court of law which includes even the Constitutional Court. They can declare any provision to be unconstitutional but till then there remains presumption of constitutional validity. 16. At this stage, we may refer to Para 68 of the judgment in the case of Vijay Madanlal Choudhary (supra) which is quoted hereunder. "68. It was also urged before us that the attachment of property must be equivalent in value of the proceeds of crime only if the proceeds of crime are situated outside India. Thi....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....egitimately without any connection with criminal activity or its result. The same, however, are intended to fall in the net because their owner is involved in the proscribed criminality and the tainted assets held by him are not traceable, or cannot be reached, or those found are not sufficient to fully account for the pecuniary advantage thereby gained. This is why for such untainted properties (held in India or abroad) to be taken away, the rider put by law insists on equivalence in value. From this perspective, it is essential that, before the order of attachment is confirmed, there must be some assessment (even if tentative one) as to the value of wrongful gain made by the specified criminal activity unless it be not possible to do so by such stage, given the peculiar features or complexities of the case. The confiscation to be eventually ordered, however, must be restricted to the value of illicit gains from the crime. For the sake of convenience, the properties covered by the second and third categories may be referred to as "the alternative attachable property" or "deemed tainted property". 17. The judgment of the Delhi High Court makes it clear that the definition ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ly the judgment of Kerala High Court going against Para 68 of the judgment of the Apex Court in the case of Vijay Madanlal Choudhary (supra). The judgment of Seema Garg (Supra) has been dealt with by the Delhi High Court in the case of Prakash Industries Ltd. v. Directorate of Enforcement reported in 2022 SCC OnLine Del 2087. The relevant paras are quoted hereunder: "76. Seema Garg principally holds that the phrase value of any such property and property equivalent in value held within the country or abroad cannot be ascribed the same meaning and effect. The learned Judges comprising the Division Bench then proceeded to hold that even if the intent of the legislature was to include any property in the hands of a person within the ambit of the expression proceeds of crime‖, there would be no need to create three limbs of definition of proceeds of crime. xx xx xx xx xx xx 79. Regard must also be had to the fact that the legislation itself is dealing with contingencies where proceeds of crime are layered and their origins camouflaged and masked enabling the accused to project or claim it to be untainted property. The Act clearly as does Axis Bank take ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... a manner that it stands deprived of vital and purposive content. The Court further notes that Axis Bank had enunciated important safeguards which would apply in respect of third-party interests in deemed tainted property. Those caveats duly secure and protect bona fide third-party interests created for valid consideration. This Court, thus, reaffirms those defences as were culled out in Axis Bank. The Court thus reiterates the interpretation accorded to Section 2(1)(u) by this Court in the aforesaid decision. Consequently, and for all the aforesaid reasons this Court finds itself unable to agree with the principles as laid down in Seema Garg as well as the subsequent decisions rendered by the Andhra Pradesh High Court in Kumar Pappu Singh Vs. Union of India and the Patna High Court in HDFC Bank Limited Vs Government of India, Ministry of Finance. 81. The Court also takes note of the position that although SLP (Crl) No. 28906/2019 is pending before the Supreme Court against the decision rendered in Axis Bank, the judgement of this Court has not been stayed or placed in abeyance. The interim order of 30 August 2019 passed in the aforesaid Special Leave Petition only require....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....efinition of "proceeds of crime" having three limbs to give meaning to each limb for the interpretation of the definition of the "proceeds of crime". The reference of Para 68 of the judgment of three judges Bench of the Apex Court in the case of Vijay Madanlal Choudhary (supra) was not cited and thus counsel for the respondent submitted that the judgment in the case of Pavana Dibur (supra) does not propound ratio on definition of "proceeds of crime" and, therefore, direction for the property acquired prior to commission crime is to be taken on facts of that case. 22. It has already been clarified by us that if the definition of "proceeds of crime" is given interpretation by dividing it into two parts or by taking only two limbs, then it would be easy for the accused to siphon off or vanish the proceeds immediately after the commission of scheduled offence and in that case none of his properties could be attached to secure the interest of the victim till conclusion of the trial. This would not only frustrate the object of the Act of 2002, but would advance the cause of the accused to promote the crime of money laundering. The Judgment in the case of Vijay Madanlal Chaudhary....